The Queen James Version: An Insult To The Tenets Of Christianity |
The brazenness of this abomination is frightening, though inevitable when homosexuality was not condemned in totality when it first reared its ugly head in the church. Allegations that King James I of England who authorized a new translation of the Bible into English in 1604 which came through in 1611 was "queer" are wicked rumours peddled by perverted and confused historians desperately seeking a basis for what they know to be patently false.
I will not even bother to engage in a long defense of the Holy Bible because we live in dangerous times where many people have chosen to believe whatever feels convenient as an explanation to justify their ignorant beliefs and perversions as foretold in the Holy Bible. However, every human is born with a consciousness; a consciousness that follows the order of nature which is basically the voice of God. The woman was created by God for man for companionship and procreation. If God hadn't intended it to be so, He never would have created Eve. Therefore, any attempt to give homosexuality a basis in Christianity is as lame as it is a perversion of nature and the natural order of creation. No logical explanation can ever deny this.
With the existence today of homosexual bishops, free thinkers and all sorts of persons who deny the very wonder of the supernatural force that brought the world into being, we are not far from a time when name of our Lord Jesus Christ will be brought into disrepute. In fact, it has already begun. In New Zealand, a church billboard questioning Jesus Christ's sexuality is already sparking controversy. It was reported that the church's billboard depicts the infant Jesus surrounded by a rainbow-colored halo (the symbol of LGBT), along with the ambiguous but highly incensing statement:
"It's Christmas. It's time for Jesus to come out."
A Reverend defended the church's sign as being about trying to lift the humanity of Jesus. "The fact is we don't know what his sexual orientation was. Would it make a difference if he was gay? Would that change the picture for you?" he is quoted as saying.
This follows the declaration of the first openly gay bishop of the U.S. Episcopal Church Gene Robinson who said Jesus would have approved of gay families because;
"...in a culture that virtually demanded marriage --(he) was a single guy, spent most of his time with twelve men, singled out three of them for leadership and one of them is known in the Bible as ‘the one whom Jesus loved.’"
The above statement is bereft of any logical correlation to the issue at hand. It is so amazing how persons who claim to be "men of the cloth" have suddenly forgotten about the divine nature of Jesus Christ which puts Him above human affections. It shows the depth of the understanding of the so-called homosexual bishop.
The end times are here people. We cannot deny it any longer. Inasmuch as we try to castigate homosexuals as perverts and sinners of the worst kind, God does not see it as such. All sin is sin unfortunately and "The soul that sinneth, it shall die." Ezekiel 18:20. Therefore, it behooves on us all to take stock of our lives, repent and prepare for the second coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. The time is now!
For the editors of Queen James, I leave them with verse 18 and 19 from the Book of Revelations, chapter 22.
"For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.
And if any man shall take away from the words from the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book."
Nuff said!
Malcolm O. Ifi.
Photocredit: Amazon.com
Hmmmmmmm, na wa.
ReplyDeleteNa real wa
Delete