By Olowogboyega Olumuyiwa.
![]() |
| Chinua Achebe |
Post-independence
proved thorny for the fledgling nation as the ideals of a new nation contrasted
horribly with political realities. Controversial elections, a disputed census
and, the General strike of 1964 a general atmosphere of misrule were the sad
post-independence realities.
The
long chain of disappointments eventually led to a Coup d’état on January 15,
1966. The coup was said to be led by a group of junior officers, most of them
Igbo. Their ringleader was Major Kaduna ChukwumaNzeogwu. This coup was quickly
crushed by Major-General AguiyiIronsi who became the Head of State; his infamous
Decree No.34 sealed his fate and led to a counter-coup.
The
“Igbo Coup” led to a thirst for revenge among the Northern section of Nigeria.
This resulted in a “counter-coup” in July 1966, led by soldiers of Northern
extraction who installed Lt. Col Yakubu Gowon as Head of state.Sadly, the coup
resulted in mass killing of Igbos in many areas In the North. This prompted
mass migration of many Igbos back to their home-towns.
According
to Achebe, the Igbos were major achievers, the fore runners in the move for
independence and an ethnic group hated by the rest of Nigeria…
"Nigeria’s
pathetic attempt to crush these idiosyncrasies rather than celebrate them is
one of the fundamental reasons the country has not developed as it should and
has emerged as a laughingstock.The
ploy in the Nigerian context was simple and crude: get the achievers out and
replace them with less qualified individuals from the desired ethnic background
so as to gain access to the resources of the state”
Achebe
described a “pogrom” with over thirty thousand men, women and children
slaughtered, hundreds of houses burnt and destroyed-with no questions asked.
The resulting
effect of the aforementioned was a deep dissatisfaction among the Eastern
section of the country spearheaded by the Premier of the Eastern region,
Lt.Col. Odimegwu Ojukwu. The efforts of the Federal Government to address the
Eastern concerns were encapsulated in the “Aburi Accord”.
A growing
frustration with the inactions of the federal government led to a feeling
Achebe coined as “Nigeria did not belong we”. Thus, on May 30, 1967, Eastern
Nigeria was declared an independent state by the name “Republic of Biafra”
named after “The Bight of Biafra”- an expanse of water. Naturally, the
Federal Government of Nigeria repudiated the secessionist move by Biafra and
declared a state of emergency and eventually, war.
Of the war,
Achebe paints a grim picture and understandably so. From the blockade of aid
and relief supplies by the federal government, to the “Asaba massacre”, Achebe
paints a gory picture. The Biafrans found themselves under armed and fatally
unprepared for a war of such magnitude and soon came under heavy assault. The Federal
Government of Nigeria did not help matters by imposing an economic blockade on
the Republic of Biafra.
Achebe’s
deepest emotion is captured when he narrates the death of his close friend, the
poet, Christopher Okigbo. He narrates how he broke the news to his family;
“When I finally got
myself home and told my family, my three year old, Ike, screamed: “Daddy, don’t
let him die!”
The mood of
Achebe’s book is rather pensive. Being an active and useful servant of the
Republic of Biafra, it is difficult to detach his sentiments as a former
Biafran. Thus, we are provided with an arguably bitter account of the attempt
of Eastern Nigeria’s quest for self-determination. His celebration
of Biafran victories on the war front while painting victories by the Nigerian
side as gory and inhuman has a somewhat shallow ring to it.
We can further
ask ourselves, how accurate is Achebe’s account, given the fact that it’s
coming almost more than 40years after the end of the war? Achebe’s
contention of a collective hatred against the Igbos is somewhat spurious and
ill-considered. In his words,
“Nigerians will
probably achieve consensus on no other matter than their common resentment of
the Igbo. The origin of the national resentment of the Igbo is as old as
Nigeria and quite as uncomplicated”.
With some
contentions of superiority reminiscent of Hitler’s “Super race”, Achebe further
contends,
“The Igbo culture,
being receptive to change, individualistic, and highly competitive, gave the
Igbo man an unquestioned advantage over his compatriots”
He further
posits that the lack of inclusion of the Igbo’s in the Nigerian setup is the
root of Nigeria’s failures. In a country like Nigeria fraught with ethnic
awareness and intolerance, I find Achebe’s contentions inflammatory.
Perhaps, he has
a case in the morality of the Federal government’s economic blockade policy
against Biafra. He did not mince words in describing Lt. Col. Gowon’s Chief of
Staff, Obafemi Awolowo,
“It is my impression
that Chief Awolowo was driven by an overriding ambition for power, for himself
in particular and for the advancement of the Yoruba people in general….However,
Awolowo saw the dominant Igbos at the time as the obstacles to that goal, and
when the opportunity arose-the Nigeria-Biafra War-his ambition drove him into a
frenzy to go to every length. In the Biafran case it meant hatching up a
diabolical policy to reduce the numbers of his enemies significantly through
starvation”.
It is
surprising that a man of Achebe’s genius would make such ad hominem remarks. In
an earlier part of the book he describes Awolowo as a “radical” and “an
upstart”.
It is conceivable
that the failure of the Republic of Biafra connived to make Achebe paranoid and
instilled in him a belief that Nigeria as a whole is out for the heads of Igbo
people.
Achebe’s
emphatic and extreme views and his failure to consider Nigeria as a whole stands
as the “Achilles heel” in an otherwise brilliant work. For a
self-professed proponent of “One Nigeria”, it is ironic that Achebe writes
first as a Biafran, secondly as a Nigerian and lastly as a writer.
We can excuse
Achebe in the Latin maxim “nemodebetesseiudex in propriacausa”, no man should be a judge in his own case. Could
Achebe ever be objective in an account that features him as a key figure?
This book also beggars the question, for a
country on the brink of collapse with deep seated distrust; does not diplomacy
suggest that Achebe should have toned down his wild allegations? Should Achebe
have developed a “God complex” and presume to know the intents and thoughts of
men such as Obafemi Awolowo?
After waiting for such a long period to
put his thoughts on paper, does wisdom and common sense not compel us to
question the veracity of his claim? An emotional story withheld for later
re-telling takes on romantic and slightly skewed proportions.
Achebe’s work stirs
up questions and it is advisable that before coming to a conclusion, Achebe’s
work should be juxtaposed with other accounts of the civil war.
The writer is on twitter @moscomoet

